基于InCites数据库的毒理学研究领域的发展态势  

Advances in In Cites-covered toxicology research

作　　者：秦丹[1] 杨渊[2] 刘宁[3] 张飘飘[1] 魏金峰[1,4] 靳洪涛[1,4] 

机构地区：[1]中国医学科学院药物研究所,北京100050 [2]中国医学科学院医学信息研究所,北京100020 [3]武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072 [4]北京协和建昊医药技术开发有限责任公司,北京100176

出　　处：《中华医学图书情报杂志》2016年第8期73-80,共8页Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science

基　　金：重大新药创制专项基金"医科院国际标准药物安全评价技术平台建设"(2013ZX09302302)

摘　　要：目的:对1980-2015年国内外毒理学科研产出、学术影响力及合作情况进行比较分析。方法:利用In Cites数据库,从发文量指标、论文被引指标、科研合作指标对毒理学研究的国家、中国科研机构和作者进行文献计量分析,并结合Web of Science数据库对高被引论文进行内容分析。结果:研究时间范围内,美国、英国和日本是毒理学研究发文相对较高的国家,我国毒理学研究发文量呈指数型增长的同时质量也显著提升,正在向世界平均水平靠近。结论:今后我国毒理学发展需在加大科研投入的同时,加强学科发展定位和体系建设,重视前沿动态与回顾分析相结合并注重国际及横向合作,加快毒理学发展步伐,提高科研成果的数量和质量。Objective To comparatively analyze the domestic and foreign sicentific product, academic impact and cooperation in toxicology from 1980 to 2015.Methods The countries, Chinese scientific research institutions and authors engaged in research of toxicology were analyzed according to the InCites-covered number of published pa-pers, cited papers and collaborations .The highly cited papers covered in Web of Sciene were analyzed by biblio-metric analysis.Results The number of papers on toxicology published by USA, Britian and Japan was greater than that published by other countries.The number of papers on toxicology published by China increased significantly and their academic level was notebly improved.Conclusion China should strengthen the subject system construc-tion, attach importance to frontier and retrospective analysis and international cooperation, speed up the develop-ment of toxicology and improve the academic level of its scientific achievements .

关 键 词：InCites 毒理学 文献计量学 

分 类 号：R99[医药卫生—毒理学]