某饮料生产企业职业病危害因素识别和控制措施分析  被引量:3

Investigation and control of occupational hazards in a beverage production plant

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王淑玉[1] 傅绍周[1] 周郁潮[1] 陈浩[1] 邓永芳[1] 潘文娜[1] 刘新霞[1] 

机构地区:[1]中山市疾病预防控制中心职业病防治所,广东中山528403

出  处:《中国卫生工程学》2016年第4期346-348,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering

摘  要:目的确定饮料生产企业职业病危害因素特征,并对关键控制措施施进行分析评价。方法采用职业卫学调查、危害因素定量检测、职业健康检查等方法对该项目进行职业病危害因素识别和控制措施分析。结果该企业职业病危害因素有:噪声、化学毒物、粉尘和高温。粉尘(含其他粉尘、活性炭粉尘和矽尘)浓度未超标;重点检测化学毒物有乙酸、丁酮、氢氧化钠、盐酸、磷酸,其中乙酸称量过程接触乙酸CSTEL浓度超标(8.7~34.5 mg/m^3),整改后符合标准要求;噪声强度为79.6~96.2 d B(A),噪声普遍超标。结论此类高度机械化企业噪声危害严重,化学毒物危害亦不容忽视。Objective To identify occupational hazards of a beverage production plant,and evaluate the occupational disease control measures. Methods Occupational hygienic investigation,quantitative measures of occupational hazards and occupational health examination were applied. Results Main occupational hazards of this plant were noise,hazardous chemicals,dust,high temperature and ultraviolet radiation. Particles not otherwise regulated,active carbon dust and cilica dust concentrations in the air did not exceed national standard. Key chemical hazards were acetic acid,butanone,sodium hydroxide,hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid. Acetic acid concentration in the air during the process of acetic acid weighing CSTELexceeded the national standard( 8. 7- 34. 5 mg / m^3). After improvement acetic acid concentration in the air complied with the national standard. Noise level was 79. 6- 96. 2 d B( A). Conclusion Such highly mechanized plants has serious noise problem. Chemical hazards should not be neglected at the same time.

关 键 词:饮料生产 职业病危害因素 控制措施 

分 类 号:R135[医药卫生—劳动卫生]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象