英、澳、美三国卫生系统绩效评价比较分析及启示  

Comparative Analysis of the Performance Evaluation of Health System among Britain,Australia and the United States and Its Enlightenment to China

作　　者：张琪[1] 张书尹 

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学,北京100026

出　　处：《中国循证医学杂志》2016年第9期993-1000,共8页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(编号:13BGL138);首都经济贸易大学研究生科技创新项目资助

摘　　要：随着卫生系统不断发展,越来越多的国家认识到卫生系统绩效评价是完善政府管理和医疗卫生服务不可或缺的一部分,一些发达国家已经建立起较为完善的评价体系,本文选择英国、澳大利亚、美国三国卫生系统绩效评价体系,对三国卫生系统绩效评价的建立历史、评价框架、评价指标、评价数据进行深入的比较分析,最后得出对完善我国"新医改"评价的启示。With the continuous development of health system, more and more countries recognize that the health system performance evaluation is an indispensable part of improving government management and health system. Some developed countries have already set up comparatively perfect evaluation systems. This paper compared and deeply analyzed the history of establishment, evaluation framework, evaluation index, and evaluation data of the health system performance evaluation systems of Britain, Australia and the United State, and some suggestions for improving the evaluation of new medical reform in China were given.

关 键 词：卫生系统 绩效评价 比较分析 “新医改” 

分 类 号：R199[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]