汉武帝时“宽厚长者皆附太子”新考——对阎步克《汉武帝时“宽厚长者皆附太子”考》一文的商榷  

An New View of“the Ministers Called Generous Elders were Attached to the Crown Prince”——Discussion on Mr. Yan Bu-ke's Paper

作　　者：颜岸青[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学历史学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《安徽史学》2016年第5期45-49,共5页Historical Research In Anhui

基　　金：教育部人文社科专项任务项目(科研诚信和学风建设)重大课题"学术规范与方法论研究"(11JDXF001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：文章通过重新分析各类核心史料,认为在汉武帝统治后期的高压政治生态下,朝中并不存在所谓"宽厚长者"守文政治势力。石徳、张安世等人亲附太子刘据,是出于政治投机目的,极少数持不同政见的臣僚,也不能作为形成政治势力的判断标准。分析武帝、太子在巫蛊之祸前后的政治表现,也难以得出所谓宽厚长者亲附太子形成政治势力的结论。巫蛊之祸超越了汉武帝、太子两条政治路线之间的纷争,交织着皇权、新兴军功集团、酷吏、外戚四股势力之间的争斗,深刻的影响了西汉中后期的政局。This article by re - analysis of various historical documents, consider that the political environment in autocratic rule under the late emperor Wu of Han Dynasty, there was no so - called political group “generous elders” on the national political stage. Shi De, Zhang An - shi and the other ministers supported the crown prince, because they want to make a political invest-ment. Even if there were a few ministers have different political views, but also could not be used as a judgment standard. The case of witchcraft（巫盖之祸）was not the contradiction between the emperor and the crown prince. Instead, there were four political groups involved in the coup, that influences on Han Dynasty were very profound.

关 键 词：汉武帝 宽厚长者 开边兴利 守文 巫蛊之祸 

分 类 号：K234.1[历史地理—历史学]