检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚松柏[1,2]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学,上海200433 [2]西南财经大学,上海200433
出 处:《创新》2016年第5期31-38,共8页Innovation
基 金:国家社科基金项目“中印农业现代化与城镇化道路比较研究”(13XGJ004)
摘 要:根据中国的资源禀赋,粮食等基本农作物的生产只能依靠传统意义上的耕者,所以,在中国新一轮农地制度改革中,依然应该遵循耕者的逻辑。在当前中国,耕者的逻辑主要体现在让真正的耕者能够较易扩大经营规模,同时降低经营成本、增加收入。在遵循耕者逻辑的同时兼顾非耕者农户利益的前提下,以"确股确权确地"的"自耕田"与"确股确权不确地"的"股权田"相结合的新型"两田制"是一个可选的改革方案。这一方案保留了旧"两田制"的优点,消除了旧"两田制"的弊端,基本上实现了改革的帕累托改进,具有明显的现实可行性。In accordance with Chinese resource endowment, the production of crops has to rely on the traditional cultivator. Therefore; in the new round of China's rural land system reform, it should follow the logic of cultivator. In present China, the logic of cultivator mainly shows that we should enable the true cultivators to enlarge operation scale easily meanwhile to lower their cost and increase their income. On the condition of cultivator's logic and the interest of non-cultivator farmers, the new two-field system which combines "farmers' own land" and "equity land" is a feasible reform plan. This plan retains the advantages of old "two-field system" land and also eradicates the disadvantages of old "two-field system" land. With its obvious feasibility, it has made a parato improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249