对涉外定牌加工商标侵权“合理注意义务＋实质性损害”判断标准的解读--以“东风”案为例  

Interpretation of the "Reasonable Care + Substantial Damages" Standard in Relation to International OEM:from the Perspective of Dongfeng Case

作　　者：宋健[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省高级人民法院

出　　处：《知识产权》2016年第9期28-36,共9页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：近十余年来,对涉外定牌加工商标侵权问题的研究从未中断过,且伴随热点案件引发阶段性热议。通过梳理我国涉外定牌加工司法实践,分析该领域裁判标准及理由的变化及成因,提出单一性裁判标准难以妥当解决涉外定牌加工商标侵权争议,极易导致商标法适用的困境。"合理注意义务+实质性损害"裁判标准,符合综合考量我国经济社会发展阶段性特征和知识产权保护公共政策属性的要求,并能够体现商标法适用与司法保护政策的妥当融合。Trademaik infringement occurred in the context of international OEM has always been a hot issue. The paper sorts out the Chinese judicial practices concerning international OEM, analyzes the changes in judgment standard and the reasons behind them, and suggests that the single judgment standard is insufficient to properly solve the international OEM trademark disputes, whereby resulting in trademark law application dilemma. The judgment standard of reasonable care ＋ substantial damages complies with the current economic situation and the IP policy in China; besides, it also integrates the trademaik law plication and judicial protection policy.

关 键 词：涉外定牌加工 裁判标准 裁判理由 标准解读 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]