论传统诉告中“小事闹大”的司法应对方式——以清代司法文书、诉讼档案为中心的考察  

Study on the Legal Solutions to the Fuss Suing Strategies in Traditional Lawsuits——A Case-study of Legal Lawsuit Archives in Qing Dynasty

作　　者：陈会林[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《湖北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第5期106-113,共8页Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目:11YJA820004

摘　　要：以"小事闹大"为诉告策略,是古今中外普遍存在的社会现象。面对这一现象,以清代司法为代表的中国传统司法所采取的应对方式主要有四类十种:一是洞察"闹"情之后"不准",包括书面审查后直批"不准"、讯问调查之后"不准";二是警示化导,让诉告者知难而退、识趣而止,包括对诉告者的风险警告和劝谕教化;三是还原"真相",严格司法,包括对案件的慎重审理、依法调解、移审和发审;四是情法变通,能动司法,包括移法就情、为民作主、官批民调。传统司法应对"小事闹大"诉告的模式并非都是"大事化小"。部分"小事闹大"诉告,以及有效的司法应对方式,不仅有助于化解复杂疑难纠纷、维护社会稳定,而且可以促进法律的发展和司法的完善。The prosecution strategy of 'stirring up the dispute' is a widespread phenomenon at all times. Traditional Chinese judicature,represented by the judicature of Qing Dynasty,adopts mainly four categories and ten types of strategies to deal with this phenomenon.The first strategy is 'No approval ' after examining the situation thoroughly,including 'No approval ' after examination of written documents and investigation of interrogation. The second one is caution and education,warning the litigant of the difficulties and consequence,and dissuading them from prosecuting. The third one is restoring the truth and enforcing the law strictly,including trying the case cautiously,mediating,transferring,and remanding for retrial. The last one is the adaptation of reason and law,and the judicial activism,which includes judging with reason as prior consideration,deciding for the people,and government-approved civil mediation. The strategies of coping with 'stirring up the dispute' prosecution don't always mean minimizing it. Some 'stirring up the dispute' prosecutions and effective coping strategies can not only contribute to mediating complex and difficult disputes,and maintaining social stability,but also promote the development of law and the perfection of judicature.

关 键 词：小事闹大 起诉 清朝 司法 策略 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]