检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉体育学院运动训练学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]上海体育学院体育教育训练学院,上海200438
出 处:《上海体育学院学报》2016年第4期58-64,共7页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基 金:国家体育总局奥运科技攻关项目(2013A001)
摘 要:运用文献资料法、录像观察法、专家访谈法等,对国际拳联新规则下我国与国外优秀男子拳击运动员比赛制胜因素进行对比分析。结果显示:国外运动员前后手直拳、前后手摆拳使用次数远多于我国运动员;国外运动员的迎击战术运用次数均高于我国运动员,中小级别差距较为明显;国外运动员运用后仰、躲闪防守反击战术远高于我国运动员,运用后撤步、格挡防守反击战术低于我国运动员。据此提出我国拳击运动员的针对性训练措施。By using the methods of literature review, video observation, and expert interview, the study compared the factors to achieve success for Chinese and foreign elite male boxers under the new rules by International Boxing Federation. The results show that foreign boxers had far more straight lead and rear cross, as well as the front swing and rear swing than Chinese boxers. Besides, foreign boxers adopted more attacking tactics than Chinese boxers, with an obvious gap between small and medium levels. Again, foreign boxers used more frequently the dodging of defensive tactics than Chinese boxers, though with a low frequency of the step back and block of defensive tactics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3