柏克与现代自然权利学说  

Edmund Burke and Modern Natural Right Theory

作　　者：张国栋[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建江夏学院公共事务学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《云梦学刊》2016年第5期78-82,共5页Journal of Yunmeng

摘　　要：柏克对自然权利时而赞美,时而否定。对这一自相矛盾的深入分析表明,柏克是在使用传统四因说的框架来思考法国大革命,并将权利视为人类行动的目的。柏克认为,人类的行动及其目的非常多样,并且总是处在复杂的环境中,因而不能以简单的抽象原则判断对错。因此,柏克并未否定自然权利,而是认为不应将其用于判断现实行动。柏克自身并未根据理论原则否定法国大革命,而是认为英国的渐进改良道路可以是更好的选择。Edmund Burke＇s attitude to natural right is self-contradictory. To investigate this self-contradiction, we find that Burke＇s thoughts on the French Revolution are within the tradition of the Four-Cause Hypothesis. He regards the rights as the end of human actions. He believes that human actions and their ends are very diverse, and are always happening in the complicated environment, thus they cannot be judged by the abstract principles. Burke believes that the theory of natural right should not be used to judge human actions rather than deny that theory. Burke himself did not use any theoretical principle to deny the French Revolution. He believes that the English model is a better choice.

关 键 词：柏克 自然权利 法国大革命 

分 类 号：D07[政治法律—政治学]