添附理论视角下的非法演绎作品保护研究  

Research on Protection of Unauthorized Derivative Works from the Perspective of Accession

作　　者：刁舜 

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2016年第8期24-34,共11页Electronics Intellectual Property

基　　金：四川省知识产权教育培训(交大)基地2015年一般项目(IP011507)

摘　　要：非法演绎作品的法律地位在我国著作权法中并不明晰,为了实现原作者、后续作品利用人及社会公众的利益平衡,司法实践已经潜移默化地运用添附规则实现了非法演绎作品的"侵权不停止",相较于借鉴版权封锁、强制许可、不当得利等制度对非法演绎作品的保护,添附规则的适用性更强。非法演绎作品的添附论具有正当性,符合著作权法的宗旨以及添附理论的历史发展需求,添附规则能够与著作权法的制度设计相融合且不会滋生著作权侵权行为。在民法典编纂的背景下,建议结合著作权的特殊性,构建非法演绎作品的添附规则以实现文化产业的持续创新。The status of the unauthorized derivative work in Chinese copyright law is not clear, for interest balance between original author and the follow-up work using people and social public, juridical practice has already automatically applied accession rules to protect unauthorized derivative work, such as non-cessation of copyright infringement. Comparing to blocking copyright, compulsory license and unjustified enrichment, accession is more suitable for the protection of unauthorized derivative work. Analyzing the legitimacy of accession theory applicable to the copyright protection of derivative works, it accords with the purpose of copyright law and demands the requirements of accession rules＇ historical development, accession rules could combine with the system of copyright law and demonstrates that accession theory would not facilitate copyright infringements. Under the background of compiling civil code, suggesting that combining with the particularity of copyright we could build the accession rules of unauthorized derivative works as to realize the continuous innovation of cultural industry.

关 键 词：非法演绎作品 侵权 添附 利益平衡 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]