检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《管理学报》2016年第9期1263-1273,共11页Chinese Journal of Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标资助项目(10&ZD136)
摘 要:理论与方法均是创造与传播管理知识的有效途径。鉴于现有文献对管理理论的强调有余,但对管理研究方法的系统关注与梳理不足,基于2000~2014年间国内管理学最重要的学术期刊——《管理世界》的样本文献,对中国组织与管理研究领域的研究方法进行系统、科学与客观的梳理,试图揭示21世纪以来本土组织与管理研究方法的三角验证水平以及内部效度、外部效度、构念效度与统计结论效度的演变与发展趋势,并针对其现状与存在的主要问题,提供有针对性的思考与建议,冀望为中国管理学科的"创造性破坏"发展以及科学演进提供分析与思考。Both theories and methodologies are effective means for creating and disseminating management knowledge.In view of the fact that existing literature have focused on management theory while the empirical concern about the management research methodology is insufficient,this article attempts to make a systematic,scientific and objective investigation on method utilization on Chinese organization and management research.Based on the sampled articles published in Management World,China's most important and influential management academic journal,during the year 2000 to the year2014,this research is developed from five aspects,namely,triangulation,internal validity,external validity,construct validity and statistical conclusion validity,trying to reveal the evolution and development trends of research methodology in Chinese organization and management field in the 21 st century.According to the status quo and the main problems discovered,this article will put forward some reflections and suggestions,hoping to provide empirical basis for Chinese management discipline's"Creative Destruction"development as well as its future evolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229