检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]漯河医学高等专科学校第二附属医院,河南·漯河462000
出 处:《临床心身疾病杂志》2016年第5期154-156,共3页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
摘 要:目的探讨品管圈联合健康教育护理路径对急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床效果。方法将60例急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者按入院顺序随机分成观察组和对照组,每组30例,均行药物保守治疗及常规护理干预,观察组采用品管圈联合健康教育护理路径对患者进行健康教育,对照组采用常规的健康教育。比较两组对疾病相关知识掌握度、情绪稳定状况、对护理满意度及并发症发生率。结果观察组对疾病相关知识掌握率、情绪稳定率、对护理工作满意率均显著高于对照组(P〈0.05),并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论品管圈联合健康教育护理路径能显著提高急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者对疾病相关知识的掌握度,稳定情绪,提高护理工作满意度,减少并发症的发生。Objective To explore the effects of quality control circle (QCC) combined with health educa- tion nursing pathway on patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods Sixty acute NSTEMI patients were randomly divided into observation and control group of 30 ones each according to admission order, both groups received drug conservative treatment and routine nursing intervention, observation group did health education according to QCC plus health education nurs- ing pathway, and control did routine health education. The command of disease related knowledge, emotional stabilization status, satisfaction to nursing and complications incidences were compared between two groups. Results The command rate of disease related knowledge, emotional stabilization rate and satis- faction rate to nursing were all significantly higher (P〈0.05) and complications incidences lower (P〈0.05). Conclusion QCC plus health education nursing pathway could notably boost the command of disease related knowledge, emotional stabilization and satisfaction to nursing of the NSTEMI and reduce the development of complications.
关 键 词:急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死 品管圈 健康教育 护理路径 护理工作满意度 并发症
分 类 号:R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145