盗伐林木罪实证研究  

Empirical Study of Crime of Illegal Felling of Trees

作　　者：晋海[1] 赵思静[2] 

机构地区：[1]河海大学法学院 [2]河海大学

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2016年第4期53-59,共7页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"气候变化背景下低碳城市的政策措施研究"(09AZD048)成果

摘　　要：对550件盗伐林木案件实证研究结果表明,盗伐林木案件多发生于经济落后、森林资源丰富的地区;被告人多为农民、文化程度低,多为个人犯罪,主要犯罪动机为谋财、认罪态度普遍较好,但上诉被告人对林业司法鉴定信服率低;案件审判质量高,平均惩罚力度较低,刑罚辅助措施适用较少;司法实践中将盗伐枯死木认定为盗伐林木罪。我国应当将"枯死木"、"盗伐"和"森林"等概念通过司法解释予以明确,降低非法运输、收购盗伐林木罪的起点,在司法实践中推广非刑罚措施的适用和合理的适用罚金刑。针对盗伐林木案件高发地区重点防治能够更好地保护森林资源。The empirical research methods are used to statistic and analysis the 550 cases of illegal felling of trees in this paper. The results show that the cases of illegal felling of trees occurred in those poor areas which have rich forest resources. And the perpetrators are mostly farmers who have low education level and almost commit the crime alone, and their main motives for the crime are for money and generally have guilty attitude, but they always do not believe in the results of judicial forest testimony. Besides, the level of appeal in those cases is low, and the judges always give lower punishment, but seldom choose non-penalty crime measures. In judicial practice illegal felling dead trees is regarded as the crime of illegal felling of trees. China should let “dead trees”, “illegal logging” and “forest” be clear through judicial interpretation , reduce the starting point for Illegal transport and purchase of trees of illegal felling crime and encourage non-penalty crime measures applied in judicial practice and apply reasonably criminal fines. In order to better protect forest resources, positive measures should be taken in the areas of high incidence of illegal felling of trees.

关 键 词：盗伐林木罪 环境犯罪 实证研究 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学]