编营分离出版模式的评价与分析  

Evaluation and analysis of the mode of separation publication

作　　者：李航[1] 张宏[2] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨金融学院学报编辑部,哈尔滨香坊区电碳路65号150030 [2]<哈尔滨工业大学学报>编辑部,哈尔滨南岗区西大直街92号150001

出　　处：《中国科技期刊研究》2016年第9期933-937,共5页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals

摘　　要：【目的】在全面分析编营分离出版模式利与弊的基础上,为学术期刊产业化发展方向提出了一些建议和思考。【方法】采用文献分析和案例分析相结合的方法,对编营分离概念的提出、特征属性及现状进行了深入研究。【结果】编营分离在理论上解决了科技期刊的属性之争,但在实践中并没有解决这一矛盾,反而造成了编辑权的分解,同时加剧了产业垄断,造成了学术交流信息不畅。【结论】现阶段,我国科技期刊采用编营分离模式发展产业化,要全面分析其利弊,并完善适合国情的多元化出版模式。[ Purposes ] Based on the comprehensive analysis of the advantage and disadvantage of the editing-management separation publication method, several suggestions are proposed for the industrialization development of academic journals. [ Methods ] The literature analysis and the case study were adopted in this paper, by which the conception, attribute and status of editing-management separation were thoroughly studied. [ Findings] Though the editing-management separation settles the dispution of the attribute of sci-tech periodicals in theory, it isn＇t effective in practice, and even leads to editing power decentralization, exacerbates the industry monopoly and result in information blockade for academic exchange. [ Conclusions ] At this stage, when the industrialization of sic- tech periodicals in China is carried out by using the editing-management separation publication model, the advantage and disadvantage should be analyzed, and the diversified publishing model should be improved to suit China＇s condition.

关 键 词：编营分离 出版模式 体制改革 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]