中美水质管理制度的比较研究  

Comparative Study on Water Quality Management System between China and USA

作　　者：胡德胜[1] 王涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学法学院

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第5期12-20,156,共9页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD215)子课题之四"最严格水资源管理制度法律保障关键措施研究"

摘　　要：水功能区水质管理是事关我国社会、经济和生态良性发展以及人民健康的战略性问题,是最严格水资源管理制度的三个核心要素之一。实现水质管理目标是我国亟待解决的重要理论和实践课题。以水资源可持续利用为理论基础,通过分析和比较美国和我国的水质管理制度和实施成效,借鉴美国日最大纳污负荷总量制度,我国可以从完善水质管理法律和水环境质量标准以及强化水质管理长效机制两个方面完善水质管理制度。Water quality management in the water function zone,one of three core factors in the Most Stringent Water Resources Management System,is of strategic importance to sustainable development of society,economy and ecosystem in China,and to peoples health as well.To achieve the water quality management goal is of great significance in both theoretical and practical aspects.Based on the theory of sustainable utilization of water resources,this paper analyzes and compares the water quality management system and its effect between China and USA,and concludes that China could perfect its water quality management system in two aspects:(i)improving the water quality management laws and water quality standards,(ii)strengthening long-term effective mechanism of water quality management.

关 键 词：最严格水资源管理制度 水质管理 排污总量控制 日最大纳污负荷总量 污水处理管理项目 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]