论医疗损害责任的归责原则  

Discussion on Doctrine of Liability Fixation in Compensation for Medical Damage

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郭婷婷[1] 

机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出  处:《天津职业院校联合学报》2016年第8期33-36,共4页Journal of Tianjin Vocational Institutes

摘  要:医疗损害责任应当适用何种归责原则,我国屡次立法来加以规制。《侵权责任法》于2010年7月1日正式颁布,医疗损害责任的规则是复杂的体系,到目前为止并没有对医患双方的责任进行很好的分配。笔者认为,本法中对于过错责任原则的适用,应当在认定医疗过失方面,对过去的举证原则进行更新,推行缓和的举证责任分配原则。在医疗损害责任纠纷中,对因果关系要件实行有条件的推定,给予医患双方更为平等的诉讼地位。China has legislated for times on which kind of doctrine of liability fixation shall be adopted in compensation for medical damage. Tort Liability Law was officially issued on July 1, 2010. The rule of compensation for medical damage is a complicated system, and until now, the responsibilities of hospitals and patients have not been specified clearly. The author holds that, as for the application of principle of liability for fault in this law, the principle of burden of proof in the past should be upgraded in terms of recognition of medical negligence, and it is suggested to carry out mitigatory allocated principles of giving testimony liability. In the disputes on compensation for medical damage, the essentials of causality should be subject to conditional presumption, to give a more equal lawsuit status to hospitals and patients.

关 键 词:医疗损害责任 归责原则 举证责任分配 

分 类 号:TS106.67[轻工技术与工程—纺织工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象