检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁祥境[1]
出 处:《广西民族师范学院学报》2016年第4期67-69,共3页
摘 要:司法认知制度是英美法系的特有产物,它能极大地避免因证明规则存在狭隘而导致的诉讼。而中国对司法认知制度的研究有限,甚至《刑事诉讼法》尚未制定关于司法认知制度的条文。这严重制约了司法认知制度在司法实践当中的运用,导致一些原本非常简单的事情因证明规则的不完善被复杂化,严重浪费了本就有限的司法资源。基于此,从刑事诉讼的视角分析了司法认知制度在中国司法实践的运用,以期促进司法认知制度在司法实践当中发挥其应有的效能。The judicial system is a special product of the Anglo American law system, which can greatly avoid the litigation caused by the existence of narrow rules.Our country is limited to the study of the judicial system, even China's "Criminal Procedure Law" has not yet been enacted in the judicial system of cognitive provisions which severely restricts the application of the judicial system in the judicial practice in China and causes some of the original very simple things to prove the rules of imperfect is complicated, seriousiy wastes of the limited judicial resources. This paper analyzes the application of judicial system in our country's judicial practice from the perspective of criminal procedure,in order to promote the judicial system in the judicial practice in our country to play its due effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15