程序正义视角下网络民意参与司法的现实制约  

Realistic Restriction of Online Public Opinions' Participation in Judicial Adjudication from the Perspective of Procedural Justice

作　　者：张昌辉[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]安庆师范大学法学院,安徽安庆246133 [2]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《北京邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期22-27,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目(SK2015A386);国家社会科学基金重点项目(12AFX002)

摘　　要：网络民意有序参与司法是新的时代背景下推进人民群众有序参与司法的重要内容。程序正义是公正、权威司法的前提和基础,是任何参与司法的外部力量必须遵循的一道底线,由此成为网络民意参与司法的基本限度和现实制约。程序正义、程序理性及其正当程序机制,为网络民意非理性因素提供过滤机制,为网络民意实体正义倾向和实质推理进路提供平衡机制,从而促成并推进网络民意对司法的有序和有效的参与。Online public opinions＇ participation in judicial adjudication is important to promote public participation in justice. The procedural justice is the foundation of fairness and authority of justice and the bottom line which any subjects＇ participation in justice must respect, and it becomes the basic limit and restriction of online public opinions＇ participation in judicial adjudication. Procedural justice, procedural rationality and dual process mechanism which ensure the orderly and effective participation are not only the filtering mechanism to the irrational factors of online public opinions, but also the balance mechanism to the substantive justice tendency and substantial reasoning approach.

关 键 词：网络民意 司法参与 程序正义 实体正义 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学] G206.3[文化科学—传播学]