机构地区:[1]河北省保定市第二医院麻醉科,071051 [2]河北省保定市第二医院手术室,071051 [3]河北省保定市第二医院妇科,071051 [4]河北省保定市第一中心医院麻醉科,071000
出 处:《中国医药》2016年第10期1542-1546,共5页China Medicine
基 金:河北省保定市科学技术研究与发展指导计划(16ZF035)
摘 要:目的探讨舒芬太尼与右美托咪定平衡镇痛对老年骨科患者循环、呼吸功能的影响。方法选取2015年6月至2016年3月于保定市第二医院行骨科手术的老年患者84例为研究对象,完全随机分为对照组和观察组,各42例。术后,对照组给予舒芬太尼150μg+昂丹司琼16mg,观察组给予舒芬太尼100μg+右美托咪定80μg+昂丹司琼16mg,2组均使用0.9%氯化钠注射液充分稀释至100ml,利用镇痛泵进行给药。比较2组术后2、4、12、24、48h的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、心率、呼吸频率、平均动脉压(1AP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、收缩压、舒张压及心率与收缩压的乘积(RPP值)。结果2组患者术后各时点VAS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。术后2h,2组患者心率、呼吸频率、NAP、SpO2差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05),观察组术后4、12、24、48h上述指标均明显低于对照组[心率:(64.5±8.6)次/min比(81.5±2.6)次/min、(65.3±8.0)次/min比(79.6±8.8)次/min、(64.7±6.6)次/min比(76.8±9.4)次/min、(63.7±7.2)次/min比(74.9±7.6)次/min;呼吸频率:(13.5±1.6)次/min比(18.6±1.5)次/min、(13.5±1.1)次/min比(18.0±1.5)次/min、(13.2±1.3)次/min比(17.9±1.3)次/min、(13.1±1.0)次/min比(16.9±1.4)次/min;MAP:(97±10)mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa)比(118±4)mmHg、(95±10)mmHg比(115±5)mmHg、(96±9)mmHg比(111±6)mmHg、(95±8)mmHg比(109±6)mmHg;SpO2:(90.7±0.7)%比(98.2±0.6)%、(89.6±0.9)%比(97.6±0.6)%、(89.7±0.8)%比(96.9±0.6)%、(89.0±0.7)%比(98.1±0.7)%],差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。观察组术后2、4、12、24、48h收缩压、舒张压以及RPP值均明显低�Objective To explore the effect of postoperative balanced analgesia of sufentanil and dexmedetomidine on circulatory and respiratory function in elderly orthopedic patients. Methods Totally 84 elderly patients who had orthopedic operations from June 2015 to March 2016 in Baoding No. 2 Hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 42 cases in each group. After operation, the control group was treated with sufentanil and ondansetron; the observation group was treated with sufentanil, dexmedetomidine and ondansetron. At 2, 4, 12, 24, 48 h after operation, visual analogue scale(VAS) score, heart rate(HR), respira- tory rate( RR), mean arterial pressure( MAP), pulse oxygen saturation( SpO2 ), systolic blood pressure ( SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and RPP value ( HR x SBP) were analyzed. Results The VAS score had no statistical difference between groups(P 〉0.05). At 4, 12, 24, 48 h after operation, HR, RR, MAP, SpO2 in observation were significantly lower than those in control group [ HR: (64. 5 ± 8.6)times/min vs (81.5 ± 2.6) times/rain, (65.3 ± 8.0 ) times/min vs (79.6 ± 8.8 ) times/rain, ( 64.7 ± 6.6 ) times/min vs ( 76. 8 ± 9.4) times/min, (63.7 ± 7.2 ) times/rain vs ( 74.9 ± 7.6 ) times/rain; RR : ( 13.5 ± 1.6 ) times/min vs ( 18.6 ± 1.5) fimes/min, ( 13.5 ± 1. 1 ) times/min vs ( 18.0 ± 1.5 ) times/min, ( 13.2 ± 1.3 ) times/min vs ( 17.9 ± 1.3 ) times/min, ( 13.1 ± 1.0) times/min vs ( 16.9 ± 1.4) times/min; MAP: ( 97 ± 10) mmHg vs ( 118 ± 4 ) mmHg, (95 ± 10) mmHg vs ( 115 ± 5 ) mmHg, (96 ± 9 ) mmng vs ( 111 ± 6) mmHg, (95 ± 8 ) mmHg vs ( 109 ± 6 ) mmHg; SPO2:(90.7 ±0.7)% vs (98.2 ±0.6)%,(89.6 ±0.9)% vs (97.6±0.6)% ,(89.7 ±0.8)% vs (96.9 ± 0. 6) %, (89.0 ± 0.7) % vs (98.1 ± 0.7) % ] (P 〉 0.05). At 2, 4, 12, 24, 48 h after operation, SBP, DBP and RPP in observation gro
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...