检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:惠博雅
机构地区:[1]郑州大学附属南阳市中心医院营养科,河南南阳473000
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第16期6-7,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的 比较鼻咽癌放疗患者营养干预中两种不同营养方式的应用效果。方法 选择本院2014年4月-2015年10月收治的行放疗治疗的鼻咽癌患者78例,随机分为两组。实验组39例,给予鼻饲肠内营养,对照组39例,给予肠外营养,观察营养干预前后两组患者的营养指标情况。结果 营养干预后,实验组各营养指标均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 鼻饲肠内营养支持方式具有更佳的干预效果,有效改善患者营养状况。Objective To compare the effect of nutritional intervention on two kinds of nutritional intervention in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with radiotherapy. Methods 78 cases with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in our hospital from April 2014 to October 2015 were treated with radiotherapy and were randomly assigned to two groups, the experimental group 39 cases were given nasogastric enteral nutrition, 39 cases in the control group, were given parenteral nutrition. The nutrition indicators nutritional intervention before and after of the two groups of patients were compared. Results After nutrition intervention, the nutritional indicators of the experimental group were better than the control group, the difference had statistical significance (P 〈 0.05 ) . Conclusion Nasogastric enteral nutritional support has better intervention effect, it can effectively improve the nutritional status of the patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229