感染性休克患者的临床麻醉分析  

Study on Clinical Anesthesia Treatment on Patients With Infectious Shock

作　　者：李晓光[1] 徐丽丽[1] 付强[1] 郑秀娟[1] 陆金彪[1] 孟春鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]鸡西市人民医院麻醉科,黑龙江鸡西158100

出　　处：《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第17期170-172,共3页China Health Standard Management

摘　　要：目的：分析感染性休克患者临床麻醉方式及效果。方法将2015年1-12月因感染性休克于我院就诊的患者共计46例纳入研究，按就诊先后顺序将其分组。对照组有23例，选择全身麻醉；研究组有23例，选择复合麻醉。对比两组术前术后HR、MAP、DBP、SBP、SpO2、R及不良反应。结果两组中研究组各项指标更优，术后HR（112.81±8.78）次/min，MAP（81.43±4.89）mm Hg，DBP（69.39±5.39） mm Hg，SBP（105.37±6.05）mm Hg，SpO2（99.21±1.29）%，R（21.14±3.34）次/min；不良反应率更低，4.35%＜21.74%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论感染性休克临床麻醉采用复合麻醉，效果较佳。Objective Make an analysis on clinical anesthesia method and its effect on patients with infectious shock.Methods Chose 46 patients with infectious shock who were treated in hospital from January to December 2015 to study and separated 23 patients into control group that were given general anesthesia treatment and another 23 patients into study group that were given combined anesthesia treatment according to their hospitalization-visitation sequence,and then make a comparison between two groups in terms of patients’values of HR,MAP,DBP,SBP, SpO2,R and side-effect incidence before and after surgery treatment respectively.ResultsPatients’values of HR,MAP,DBP,SBP, SpO2 and R after surgery treatment in these two groups were much more favorable than counterparts before surgery treatment as follows,HR （112.81±8.78）times/min,MAP（81.43±4.89）mm Hg,DBP（69.39±5.39）mm Hg,SBP（105.37±6.05）mm Hg,SpO2（99.21±1.29）%, R（21.14±3.34）times/min;besides,side-effect incidence in study group was much lower than that in control group,4.35%〈21.74%,there was a differential between two groups and such a differential had statistic value（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Combined anesthesia treatment is quite effective on patients with infectious shock.

关 键 词：感染性休克 复合麻醉 全身麻醉 效果 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]