检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王莉华[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省广州市花都区人民医院,广东广州510800
出 处:《临床医学工程》2016年第9期1267-1268,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的观察护理流程对口腔种植效率和患者满意度的影响。方法选取我院口腔种植修复的患者72例,其中研究组(37例)采用口腔种植护理,对照组(35例)采用常规护理,比较两组种植成功率、护理效率。采用自行设计的满意度调查问卷对患者对口腔种植护理的满意度进行调查。结果两组的种植成功率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组因配合和器械维护而影响工作的比率分别为2.70%和8.11%,显著低于对照组的22.86%和31.43%(P<0.05);两组患者的种植效果的满意度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者的护理满意度为94.59%,显著高于对照组的74.29%(P<0.05)。结论个性化的口腔种植护理流程可提高护理效率和患者满意度。Objective To observe the effect of nursing process on oral implantion efficiency and satisfaction degree of patients.Methods 72 cases of patients with oral implantation admitted to our hospital were selected. The study group (37 cases) received oralimplantion nursing, while the control group (35 cases) received conventional nursing. The successful rate of implantion and nursing efficiencywere compared between two groups. The self-designed satisfaction questionnaire was used to investigate the satisfaction degree of patientsfor oral implantion nursing. Results No statistical difference was found in the successful rate of implantion between two groups (P〉0.05).The rates of coordination and equipment maintenance effecting implantion were 2.70% and 8.11% respectively, significantly lower than22.86% and 31.43% of control group (P〈0.05). No statistical difference was found in the satisfaction degree of implantion efficiency ofpatients between two groups (P〉0.05). The nursing satisfaction degree of patients was 94.59%, significantly higher than 74.29% of controlgroup (P〈0.05). Conclusions Personalized oral nursing process can improve nursing efficiency and satisfaction degree of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3