《刑法修正案(九)》第四条实施的困境分析  

The Dilemma of the Implementation of Criminal Law Amendment(9) Article 4

作　　者：李井方[1] 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《绵阳师范学院学报》2016年第9期49-52,共4页Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(九)》第四条首次从立法上明确规定了对于不同种有期自由刑的数罪并罚问题,为不同种有期自由刑的数罪并罚提供了明确的法律依据。但其理论基础的构成值得商榷,导致在司法实践中对不同种有期自由刑的数罪并罚产生了诸多问题,使得司法的公正和效率受到损害。Criminal Law Amendment （9） article 4, for the first time, clearly stipulates the different kinds of fixed - term freedom penalty problems of combined punishment for several crimes in legislation, providing a clear legal basis for different kinds of combined punishment for several crimes of fixed - term freedom penalty. But the composition of the theoretical basis of different kinds of fixed - term freedom penalty is open to question, producing several problems in the judicial practice for different kinds of fixed - term freedom penalty problems of combined punishment for several crimes, further making the justice and efficiency of judicature suffer damage.

关 键 词：刑法修正案 数罪并罚 折衷说 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]