检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]延安大学附属医院普外科,陕西延安716000 [2]延安大学附属医院护理部,陕西延安716000
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2016年第18期76-79,共4页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基 金:陕西省延安市科技局项目(2013KW06);陕西省教育厅(2013 JK0805)
摘 要:目的探讨胃癌患者KAP护理干预方法及效果。方法将本院2014年7月—2015年6月收治的80例胃癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组各40例,对照组采用常规护理教育,观察组在常规护理基础上进行KAP护理干预,比较两者KAP的掌握情况、治疗效果以及生活质量。结果观察组的KAP知识、态度、行为得分以及总分均高于对照组,临床症状改善率高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组出院前的躯体疼痛、社会功能、心理功能、活力等方面的生活质量均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对胃癌患者进行KAP干预能够提高患者的知信行水平,改善治疗效果,提高生活质量。Objective To explore the method and effect of KAP nursing intervention in pa- tients with gastric cancer. Methods A total of 80 patients with gastric cancer in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases). The control group was received routine health education, the observation group was given KAP nursing intervention based on the control group, their KAP mastery, therapeutic effect and life quality were compared. Results The KAP knowledge, attitude, behavior score and total score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the improvement rate of clinical symptoms was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). The life quality in physi- cal pain, social function, mental function and vitality before discharge in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclu- sion KAP intervention can improve the level of knowledge and information, the treatment effect and quality life of patients with gastric cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3