检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京航天中心医院外一病房,北京100049 [2]北京航天中心医院普外科,北京100049 [3]海军总医院保健科,北京100049
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2016年第6期96-98,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的比较老年人便秘导致的粪石性肠梗阻不同灌肠方法的护理效果。方法选取确诊老年便秘性肠梗阻患者36例,随机分成2组,分别采用常规灌肠法(B组)和持续注水深入置管灌肠法(A组),各18例。结果比较2组患者治疗用时、治疗次数、梗阻缓解等观察指标,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论持续注水深入置管灌肠法在老年人粪便性肠梗阻的治疗过程中有显著效果,其方法安全、有效并缩短治疗时间,值得临床应用。Objective To investigate nursing experience of different enema methods for the stercoral obstruction due to constipation in elderly patients. Methods A total of 36 elderly patients diagnosed as the stercoral obstruction due to constipation were randomly divided into group A applying continuous irrigation of water and deeply inserted colorectal enema and group B using conventional enema. Results The difference in treatment time, treatment times and alleviation time of obstruction were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Continuous irrigation of water and deeply inserted enema has obvious therapeutic efficacy for elderly patients, and it is safe and can significantly shorten treatment time, so it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.169.138