检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范晓华[1] 曹岳蓉[1] 刘洪珍[2] 唐菊娣[2]
机构地区:[1]东南大学医学院附属江阴医院护理部,214400 [2]东南大学医学院附属江阴医院心血管内科,214400
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第12期1724-1728,共5页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨预见性护理在急性心肌梗死( AMI)并行保护性临时起搏患者中的临床应用效果。方法采用便利抽样法选择130例AMI接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗( PCI),且术前行保护性临时起搏的患者为研究对象,根据入院时间分为对照组和观察组,各65例,对照组给予常规护理干预,观察组在此基础上给予预见性护理。记录分析两组患者恶性心律失常、低血压和严重并发症的发生情况。结果对照组和观察组患者均以右冠病变为主,分别占80.00%,76.92%(52/65,50/65),两组患者梗死血管差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组恶性心律失常发生率(7.69%)较对照组(18.46%)有降低的趋势,但差异无统计学意义( P=0.069);观察组右冠梗死患者中发生恶性心律失常比例为6.00%(3/50),低于对照组的21.15%(11/52),差异有统计学意义(P=0.026)。观察组发生低血压的比例为12.31%,低于对照组的26.15%,差异有统计学意义( P=0.045);接受预见性护理患者的并发症发生率较常规护理患者有降低的趋势(10.77%比20.00%),但差异无统计学意义( P=0.145)。结论对接受保护性临时起搏的AMI患者实施预见性护理,可以减少恶性心律失常和低血压的风险,对临床护理有一定的指导意义。Objective To investigate the effects of predictive nursing intervention on acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ) patients undergoing temporary preventive cardiac pace maker .Methods A total of 130 patients with AMI undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI) were enrolled by convenience sampling method and divided into control group (n=65) and observation group(n=65) according to the time of admittion.All patients were received temporary preventive cardiac pace maker before PCI .Routine nursing was applied in patients of the control group , and predictive nursing was applied in patients of the observation group . Malignant arrhythmia , hypotension and serious complications were recorded and analyzed .Results In both groups, the right coronary artery was the main artery of the infarction , accounting for 80.00%(control group, 52/65), 76.92%(observation group, 50/65) respectively, the difference was not statistically significant (P〉0.05).Malignant arrhythmia rate in the observation group tended to decrease compared with that of the control group (7.69% vs 18.46%), but there′s no statistically significant difference ( P =0.069 ).Malignant arrhythmia rate of right coronary artery infarction in the observation group was lower than that of the control group (6.00%vs 21.15%) ( P =0.026 ).12.31% of observation group patients developed hypotension versus 26.15% in the control group ( P =0.045 ).Predictive nursing intervention had a tendency to reduce complications occurrence compared with routine nursing intervention (10.77%vs 20.00%), but no statistical significance was achieved(P=0.145).Conclusions Implementation of predictive nursing intervention among AMI patients undergoing temporary preventive cardiac pace maker plays an important role in reducing the risks of malignant arrhythmia and hypotension , which has certain meaning for the clinical nursing .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3