商标指示性合理使用探析  

Research on the Indicative Reasonable Use of Trademarks

作　　者：凌洪斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期9-13,共5页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"‘和谐世界’理念下国际知识产权制度重构的若干法律问题研究"(08BFX083);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金项目"二十一世纪国际知识产权制度发展中的若干重大法律问题研究"(07JJD820163)

摘　　要：商标指示性合理使用是商标侵权抗辩的重要事由,但由于其内涵和外延比较模糊,判断标准也不够具体和明确,因此造成司法适用上的困难,这不仅给利害关系人陡增困扰,同时也极大地损害了法律的权威性。因此亟须厘清商标指示性使用的概念,明确符合"必要""善意"和"合理"等主客观条件的商标指示性使用是侵权豁免的行为,同时,我国立法也应当完善和构建科学、合理的商标指示性合理使用制度,以期更好地指导和服务商标法律实践。The indicative reasonable use of trademarks is the important reason for trademark in-fringement defense, but its connotation and denotation are relatively vague and judgment standards are not specific and clear either, which results in difficulties in judicial application. It not on-ly perplexes the interested persons, but also greatly damages the authority of the law. Therefore it is necessary to clarify the concept of the indicative use of trademarks and to define that the indicative use of trademarks which conforms with such subjective or objective conditions as ＂necessity＂.＂goodwill＂ and ＂rationality＂ is immune to infringement. Meanwhile the scientific and rational system of the indicative reasonable use of trademarks should also be constructed and perfected by China＇s legislation so as to better guide and serve the legal practice of trademarks.

关 键 词：指示性使用 商标 善意 合理 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]