检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州人福博赛生物技术有限责任公司,河南郑州450016 [2]郑州金水区总医院检验科,河南郑州450000
出 处:《中外女性健康研究》2016年第13期5-6,共2页Women's Health Research
摘 要:目的:探讨唾液酸酶法在细菌性阴道病(Bv)临床检测中的诊断价值。方法:严格按照唾液酸酶法检测试剂盒操作说明书进行操作,同时使用Amsel法进行检测对照,并对两者的结果进行比较。结果:467例疑似细菌性阴道病样本中,唾液酸酶法检出阳性样本例数为136例,阳性率为29.1%;Amsel法检出阳性样本例数为129例,阳性率为27.6%。差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:唾液酸酶法检测BV具有操作简便、设备简单、结果直观、特异性强等优点,可以代替Amsel法用于门诊患者的BV筛查。Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of the sialidase method in clinical examination of bacterial vaginosis(BV).Methods:Observing and comparing the results obtained by using sialidase assay kit and that by using Amsel assay.Results:Among the results of 467 cases of suspected bacterial vaginal disease,there were 136 cases detected as positive by using the sialidase method(29.1%);and there were 129 cases detected as positive by using the Amsel method(27.6%).The difference is not statistically significant(P〉0.05).Conclusion:Sialic acid enzymatic method in detection BV has the advantages of easy operation,simple equipment,visual result,and strong specificity etc.The method can replace Amsel in BV screening for outpatients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.140.134