历史语言研究所学术群体治史风格述论  

Historical Research Style of the Academic Community in Institute of History and Philology

作　　者：张峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学历史学院,陕西西安710069

出　　处：《史学史研究》2016年第3期60-67,共8页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"中外史学交流视野下的历史语言研究所学术范式与成就探析"(项目编号:15CZS002)阶段性成果

摘　　要：历史语言研究所是在中外史学交融的背景下催生的现代史学研究机构。它于1928年由傅斯年创办,至1948年底迁往台湾。于此20年间,史语所汇聚了众多精于考证的一流学者,俨然在现代中国学术史上形成了一个学术群体。史语所学人治史虽各善其长,但作为一个现代学术社群,又彰显出共有的风格,即重视发掘新史料以揭示被淹没的史实、在学术实践中蕴涵着"以小见大"的治史旨趣和求通而不锢于断的治史视野。考察史语所学术群体的治学特色,不仅有助于科学地评价史语所在现代中国学术版图中的历史贡献,而且裨益于重新认识新旧学问在现代中国的转变,以及整个新历史考证学派在20世纪中国史学发展中的历史地位。The Institute of History and Philology, established by Fu Sinian in 1928 and relocated to Taiwan at the end of 1948, came from the background of Chinese and foreign academic exchange. During those 20 years, a number of first-rate scholars who were proficient in textual research gathered in it and formed an academic community in modern China. These scholars owned strong point in respective fields, but as members of a modern academic community, they also shared a common research style, namely attaching importance to excavating new historical sources to reveal the submersed historical facts, pursuing the objective of ＂seeing far from bits＂ in research and paying attention to general history instead of dynastic history. A Study on academic features of academic community in Institute not only contributes to evaluating the historical value of the Institute in academic history of modern China, but also is helpful in rethinking the change between old and new learning in modern China and the role of entire school of new historical textual research in the 20th century＇ s Chinese historiography.

关 键 词：历史语言研究所 学术群体 新史料 以小见大 历史通识 现代中国史学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]