检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省阳江市人民医院护理部,阳江529500
出 处:《当代护士(中旬刊)》2016年第10期70-72,共3页Modern Nurse
摘 要:目的探讨循证护理干预对重症脑血管意外患者便秘发生率的影响。方法选取本科84例重症脑血管意外患者随机分为对照组42例,观察组42例,将运用循证护理干预前的患者作为对照组,运用循证护理干预后的患者作为观察组,运用循证护理方法制定、实施便秘预防措施,观察并对比运用循证护理干预前后患者便秘的发生率以及护理满意度情况。结果运用循证护理干预后比干预前患者便秘发生率明显降低,比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论护理人员在护理实践中应运用循证护理,体现了护理的科学性和严谨性,使护理质量和患者满意度明显提高,达到了护患双赢的目的。Objective To study the effect of evidence - based nursing intervention on the constipation incidence of patients with cerebrovascular accident. Methods 84 patients with cerebrovascular accident were randomly divided into two groups, namely the control group with s and the observation group. The 42 cases before applying the evidence - based nursing intervention were as the control group, while 42 cases accepted evidence - based nursing intervention were as the observation group. Compare the constipation incidence of the two groups. Results The constipation incidence 'after applying the evidence -based nursing intervention was obviously lower than that before the intervention (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion The evidence - based nursing intervention fully embodies the scientific and rigorous, and improves the nursing quality and the patients' satisfaction ,which helps to achieve the Win -win of nurses and patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.87.126