检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青海师范大学政法学院,青海西宁810008 [2]北京天达共和律师事务所,北京100014
出 处:《开放导报》2016年第5期94-98,共5页China Opening Journal
摘 要:随着经济与社会的发展,我国的专利总量连年创出新高,这使得相关纠纷也不断增加。作为解决纠纷的重要途径,我国现行专利无效判定制度的弊端愈发显现。应允可人民法院对专利的合法性与有效性问题进行判定,并采判决的对世效力,加强行政机关与法院的信息共享,促使专利判定的协调化与合理化。With the development of economy and society, China's total patent is growing every year, which makes the related disputes are increasing. As an important way to solve disputes, the malpractice of the current patent invalidity determination system appear increasingly in China. Viewing the patent invalidity determination system of the United States, there is great reference value in its associated systems and procedures. In view of the shortcomings of patent invalidity determination system, we should promised to the court to judge the legality and validity of the patent, and adopt a judgment to be effective to everyone, enhance information sharing between the executive authorities and the courts, and to promote harmonization and rationalization to the judgment of the patent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147