检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖吓鹏[1] 林斌[1] 郑赟[1] 陈振霖[1] 廖乘龙[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属宁德市医院,福建宁德352100
出 处:《中外医学研究》2016年第27期163-164,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:探讨快速康复外科理念在肝切除围手术期处理中的应用效果。方法:选择2014年5月-2015年8月在笔者所在科进行肝叶切除手术的患者100例,随机分为传统组和快速康复组,每组50例。比较分析两组患者术后24 h疼痛指数、首次排气时间、术后住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症情况。结果:手术后,快速康复组术后24 h疼痛指数、首次排气时间、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症发生情况均明显优于传统组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:快速康复外科理念在肝切除围手术期处理中具有明显的积极作用,值得临床广泛运用。Objective:To explore the application effect of the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery resection in the perioperative treatment of liver.Method:From May 2014 to August 2015,100 cases of patients with liver resection surgery in our department were randomly divided into conventional group and fast rehabilitation group,with each group 50 cases.The 24 h pain index,the first exhaust time,postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Result:After operation,the 24 h pain index,the first exhaust time,postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications of the fast rehabilitation group were better than those of the traditional group,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:The concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery has obvious positive effect,which is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145