风险刑法的理论错位  

Theoretical Misunderstandings of Risikostrafrecht

作　　者：胡彦涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2016年第5期62-77,共16页Global Law Review

摘　　要：近年来,风险刑法成为刑法学界的新宠,讨论异常热烈。遗憾的是,无论是风险刑法的支持者还是反对者都对风险社会理论所言的"风险"存在不同程度的误解。尽管刑法所打击的"危险"同风险社会理论中的"风险"在人为性、未来性、延展性上存在相同之处,但二者也在合法性、两面性上存在很大的差别。因此不能将"危险"和"风险"二者简单等同,刑法也不能因打击"危险"而演变成"风险刑法"。在风险社会理论中,风险并非人们谈之色变的恶魔,恰恰相反,风险是获取更高安全标准的钥匙,风险社会亦非真实的社会形态,无法成为刑法理念变迁的社会背景。换言之,风险社会理论不能成为风险刑法正当性的理论基础。In recent years, Risikostrafrecht has become a hot topic among criminal law scholars in China. But unfortunately, both supporters and opponents of Risikostrafrecht have certain misunderstandings about the term ＂ risk＂ in the Theory of Risk Society, because they confuse ＂risk＂ with ＂danger＂. Although the ＂danger＂ combated by the criminal law and the ＂risk＂ in the Theory of Risk Society share such commonalities as artificiality, futurity, and ductility, they differ considerably in legitimacy and duality. Therefore, ＂danger＂ should not be simply equated with ＂risk＂, nor should the criminal law be equal with the ＂risk criminal law＂ merely because it combats ＂danger＂. In the Risk Society Theory, risk is not a demon at the mention of which people turn pale. On the contrary, risk is the key to higher safety standards. Risk Society is not the real social form and can not be turned into the social backdrop of idea change in criminal law. In other words, the Risk Society Theory can not be the basis of the legitimacy of Risikostrafrecht

关 键 词：危险 风险社会 自反性现代性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]