《庄子》寓言与《伊索寓言》中对话介入对比研究  

A Comparative Analysis of Dialogic Engagement in the Fables in Zhuangzi and Aesop's Fables

作　　者：管淑红[1] 刘鸽[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东交通大学外国语学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《天津外国语大学学报》2016年第5期42-48,81,共7页Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目"中西古代寓言评价对比研究"(12YJAZH021)

摘　　要：寓言是一种独特的文学语篇,它借助虚构的故事来表达观点和态度,以达到劝诫和教育等目的,这与评价理论中的借言思想有类似之处。从功能语言学角度出发,将评价理论之介入系统作为分析框架,以在中西文学史上同具重要地位的《庄子》寓言和《伊索寓言》为研究对象,选取有显性对话的语篇,运用语料库研究方法,对两者中介入资源分布情况进行比较分析。研究发现两部著作在使用显性对话介入寓言故事来隐性传达评价的方式上同中有异,异中有同。As a kind of unique literary discourses, fables express the opinions and attitudes with fictional stories to achieve the preaching and educating purposes, which is similar to the idea of heteroglossia of appraisal theory. In the framework of engagement system of appraisal theory, this paper analyses the fables in Zhuangzi and Aesop's Fables, the important works in the history of both Chinese and Western literature, from the perspective of functional linguistics. The paper chooses the discourses with dominant dialogues to make a corpus-based comparative analysis of the distribution o engagement resources, and finds that there are differences and similarities between the ways of the two works to convey appraisal meaning implicitly with explicit dialogues as engagement resources.

关 键 词：寓言 对话介入 对比研究 

分 类 号：I106.7-03[文学—世界文学]