检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴中伦[1]
机构地区:[1]贵州财经大学,贵阳550025
出 处:《工业技术经济》2016年第10期102-108,共7页Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"战略性新兴产业集群生态创新机理及其生态创新政策研究"(项目编号:14CJY002)
摘 要:本文采用DEA-SBM方法对我国工业企业产品创新效率进行了测评。研究表明,由于纯技术效率水平低下,目前我国各省市工业企业产品创新效率普遍较低。总体而言,东部地区工业企业产品创新呈现规模收益递减趋势,产品创新投入相对过剩;西部地区呈现规模收益递增趋势。技术效率和规模效应的区域差异并不明显,纯技术效率在不同地区间的差异显著。研究结论为我国区域工业企业产品创新提供政策启示。The product innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises in China is evaluated using DEA-SBM method. The research shows that product innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises is generally low in China' s provinces and cities because of the low level of pure technical efficiency. Overall,the product innovation in eastern industrial enterprises shows trends of diminishing return to scale,the investment of product innovation is relative surplus; the product innovation in western area shows trends of increasing return to scale. There is no obvious regional differences on technical efficiency and scale effect,and the difference of pure technical efficiency among different regions is significant. The research conclusion provides policy implications for the product innovation of regional industrial enterprises in china.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229