不同采血方法在血常规相关检验中的应用价值  

The Application Value of Different Methods of Blood Tests on Blood Routine

作　　者：林胜[1] 

机构地区：[1]资阳市第一人民医院检验科,四川资阳641300

出　　处：《医疗装备》2016年第19期138-139,共2页Medical Equipment

摘　　要：目的探讨不同采血方法在血常规的相关检验中的应用价值。方法收集2015年4月至2016年4月医院进行血常规检查的100例患者,对所有患者均行静脉及末梢采血,静脉采血样本数据作为A组数据,末梢采血样本数据作为B组数据,比较A,B组血常规数据。结果 A组RBC,MCV,MCHC,PLT检测水平显著高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);A组HCT,MCH检测水平显著高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组WBC检测水平显著低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);A组血常规各项检测结果 CV水平与B组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论静脉采血方法具有比较好的稳定性及准确度,可避免各种因素对血常规检测结果的干扰,具有借鉴意义。Objective The application value of different blood collection methods on blood related inspection in. MethodsCollect 2015 years 4 months to April 2016 to the station of the blood routine examination of 100 patients, for all patients underwent venous and peripheral blood, venous blood sample data as a set of data, peripheral blood sample data as group B data, compare a, B group data of blood routine examination. Results Group A samples RBC, MCV, MCHC, PLT level significantly higher than in group B, there are significant differences, with statistical significance(P<0.01); HCT in group A samples, the detection level of MCH significantly higher than in group B, there was a significant difference, with statistical significance(P<0.05); group A samples WBC level was significantly lower than that of group B, there significant difference has statistical significance(P<0.01); patients in group A and group B blood the detection results of CV level and group B exist obvious difference, with statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion Venous sampling method has better stability and accuracy, can avoid the interference of various factors on the detection results of blood routine, with reference significance.

关 键 词：静脉血 末梢血 血常规 应用价值 

分 类 号：R446.11[医药卫生—诊断学]