创新政策制定的跨部门协调机制——中美实践比较分析  

Cross-department Coordination Mechanism of Innovation Policy Development——Comparative Analysis of Chinese and American Practice

作　　者：宋潇[1] 罗若愚[2] 杨俊杰 

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学融智学院,重庆400067 [2]电子科技大学政治与公共管理学院,四川成都610054 [3]四川省工业经济发展研究中心,四川成都610017

出　　处：《科技进步与对策》2016年第19期94-100,共7页Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基　　金：中外创新对话专项美大地区研究项目(2014KJBMDZM06)

摘　　要：国家创新能力是衡量一个国家发展水平的重要指标,创新政策是提升国家创新能力的重要手段,多部门推出的创新政策"组合拳"关乎国家创新能力的命脉。因此,实现多部门协同创新即跨部门协调合作显得至关重要。中美两国最初以不同方式组建了国家创新体系,美国以市场为导向,中国以政府为导向,其结果是美国形成了"官产学研用"创新模式,中国仍停留在"官产学研"阶段。在创新政策制定过程中,美国形成了"制衡-合作"的跨部门协调主导模式,中国形成了"等级-线性"的跨部门协调主导模式。对比研究发现,中国国家创新体系存在创新转化能力弱的问题,而跨部门协调存在协调范围窄、协调方式单一、协调时效性滞后、协调不规范、主体间协调沟通机制不健全等问题。National innovation ability is an important indicator to measure a country's development.The innovation policy is apowerful tool to promote national innovation ability,moreover,the combination of innovation policy introduced by multidepartment relates to lifeline of national innovation ability.Therefore,it is crucial to improve inter-department coordination and cooperation to realize collaborative innovation of multi-department.Initially China and America built nation innovation system in different ways,America market-oriented,China government-oriented.As a result,America has formed an innovation mode of government-industry-academy cooperation,but China also stayed on the phase of officialdom-academy.In the process of set innovation policy,America has formed Checks and Balances,which is a dominant mode of cross-department coordination,but China has formed Rating-Linear.By comparing the study found that Chinese national innovation system existed a series problems,such as the weak ability of transformation innovation,the narrow range of coordination,the single way of coordination,the timeless lag of coordination,the non-standard of coordination,and the inadequate communication mechanism of coordination between innovation main body.

关 键 词：创新政策 政策制定 跨部门协调 中美比较 

分 类 号：F204[经济管理—国民经济]