检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程亭秀
机构地区:[1]东宁第一人民医院康复医学科,黑龙江牡丹江157299
出 处:《颈腰痛杂志》2016年第5期424-426,共3页The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
摘 要:目的观察两种不同手法强度对慢性跖筋膜炎治疗效果的影响。方法应用强度200N/cm^2康复治疗跖筋膜炎,与强度100 N/cm^2康复治疗的跖筋膜炎作对照,以疼痛日记为疗效指标,晨起第一步时及每天最痛时的VAS评分与对照组相比较。结果经8周治疗且随访3个月,强度200 N/cm^2的手法治疗慢性跖筋膜炎优于强度100 N/cm^2,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论在治疗慢性跖筋膜炎方面,手法强度与疗效有着明显关系,大强度手法的效果较好。Objective To observe the effects of two different massage technique on the strength in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. Methods Application of strength of 200 N/cm^2 rehabilitation treatment for plantar fasciitis, compared with the application of strength 100 N/cm^2 rehabilitation treatment for plantar fasciitis. The pain diary was used as the efficacy index, the first step in the morning and the day when the most pain VAS score was compared with the control group. Results After 8 weeks of treatment and 3 months of follow-up, the strength of 200 N/cm^2 method for treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis was better than the strength of 100 N/cm^2 way ,and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.01). Conclusion In the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis, techniques and treatment intensity has obvious relationship, high massage technique strength is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.150