检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]台州学院经贸管理学院
出 处:《中国名城》2016年第10期44-46,57,共4页China Ancient City
摘 要:近年来,"资源诅咒"论的流行推理到"旅游资源诅咒论",但在实证检验、传导机制说明和政策建议上都存在重大缺陷。旅游资源诅咒的前提条件是以资源为基础的旅游产业存在挤出效应,导致旅游资源丰富地区经济增长速度反而低于那些旅游资源贫乏地区的增长率。但由于旅游资源丰度评价不合理,或者从旅游资源"错位现象"推理到旅游资源诅咒,忽视旅游业的综合带动功能和融合发展功能,"旅游资源诅咒"论不能得到真正验证,旅游资源诅咒传导机制的解释值得商榷。In recent years, viewpoint of tourism resource curse is from the viewpoint of resource curse. But there are major defects of proof in demonstration test, conduction mechanism and policy suggestion. Because of making evaluation of tousism resource mistake, or taking misplacement phenomenon as the tourism resources curse, the viewpoint of tourism resource curse can't be really verified by the inference. Tourism resources' dislocation can provide references for adjustment of regional tourism development, which can' t be confused with d/slocation development and tourism resource curse. The interpretation of the transmission mechanism of the tourism resources curse is questionable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28