职务犯罪自首认定司法解释的反思——兼评《刑事审判参考》第755号案件  

Self-examination about Judicial Interpretation of Duty Crime Surrender Recognition——with Discussions of No.755 Case in Reference to Criminal Trial

作　　者：王杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《净月学刊》2016年第5期81-85,共5页Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy

摘　　要：现行《刑法》对于犯罪自首的规定过于原则性,自首认定上的困境延伸到了职务犯罪自首的认定中。职务犯罪自首认定的困境首先来源于"自动投案"认定的标准存在"犯罪事实""犯罪嫌疑人""办案机关掌握的线索指向的事实"三者之间的矛盾,其次是对余罪自首中的"同种罪行"进行了不必要的扩张。"线索指向的事实"如能锁定犯罪嫌疑人,则其无成立自首的可能,而对"同种罪行"应理解为罪数上的连续犯,因此罪犯的犯行即使触犯同一罪名,如有同种数罪的可能,应认为仍有成立自首之可能。Surrender in the criminal Law is too principled, this problem extends to duty crime surrender. This dilemma comes from the contradictions among ＂criminal facts＂, ＂suspect＂ and ＂the fact that authorities handling clues point to＂in the identification criteria of ＂voluntary surrender＂, the other reason is the unnecessary expansion about ＂the same kind of crimes＂ in the confession of remaining crime.if＂the fact the clues point to＂ can locked suspects, it has no possible to established surrender, and for the＂same kind of crimes＂ we can understand as continuous commit in the number of crimes. Therefore, even if the the offender commit several crimes but there are the same species maybe, shall be considered as surrender.

关 键 词：职务犯罪 自首 自动投案 同种罪行 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]