检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150090 [2]哈尔滨工业大学结构工程灾变与控制教育部重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨150090 [3]西安大略大学土木与环境工程系
出 处:《建筑结构学报》2016年第10期154-161,174,共9页Journal of Building Structures
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51478147)
摘 要:在极值分析中,样本量不足会导致小样本效应,这将影响分析结果,需采取适当措施予以减弱。以黑龙江省83个气象台站测得的积雪数据为例,探讨了区域频率分析方法在基本雪压估算中的应用。为此,介绍了区域频率分析的具体步骤,而后采用蒙特卡洛模拟技术,以模拟计算结果的均方根误差与偏差分布情况为基准,将区域频率分析方法与两种常用方法进行了对比。模拟结果表明,区域频率分析方法能有效提高基本雪压估算结果的准确性和稳定性,当样本数量较小时,其优势更加明显。最后给出了3种不同方案估算得到的黑龙江省基本雪压分布图,发现我国规范建议的估算方法偏于保守。Small sample size effect affects the accuracy of the extreme value analysis results. Various techniques could be applied to reduce this effect,including the regional frequency analysis( RFA). An application of RFA to estimate the ground snow load using annual maximum snow depth records from 83 meteorological stations in Heilongjiang province was presented. The estimated extreme values were compared with those obtained from on-site analysis.Moreover,Monte-Carlo technique was employed to assess the adequacy of the RFA versus the on-site analysis to estimate the extreme snow depth or snow load. Judging based on root-mean-square-error and the bias obtained from the simulation analysis,it is concluded that the RFA is preferred,especially when the sample size is relatively small. The snow load contour maps are developed for the province by using return period values of annual maximum snow load estimated by three different approaches,indicating that the approach recommended by the Chinese design code is relatively conservative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.106.4