古史辨“抄袭”公案新探——兼与廖名春、吴锐两位先生商榷  

A New Research on the Intricate Issue of Plagiarism in Gushibian and as an Additional Discussion with Liao Mingchun and Wu Rei

作　　者：李长银[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学历史学院

出　　处：《史学月刊》2016年第10期5-15,共11页Journal of Historical Science

摘　　要：在"古史辨运动"兴起之际,钱玄同、顾颉刚的"疑古"思想是否受到了白鸟库吉"尧舜禹抹杀论"的直接影响,是20世纪末以来困扰学术界的一桩公案。廖名春指出,"古史辨运动"的兴起主要源于"尧舜禹抹杀论"。吴锐则持反对意见,甚至认为二者之间不存在任何关系。廖、吴二氏的说法均存在一定的问题。从现有资料来看,钱玄同、顾颉刚在当时确曾通过一些间接文本对"尧舜禹抹杀论"有所了解,但了解不等于受其直接影响。推测此中缘由,要在钱、顾二氏并不认为"尧舜禹抹杀论"是一种"非常异义可怪之论",故受其影响可以说微乎其微,"抄袭"之说更是无从讲起。这桩学术公案或就此盏棺论定。Whether Qian Xuantong and Gu Jiegang＇s historical skepticism was directly affected by ＂Erasing Yao-ShunYu＂ thesis or not,which was always a controversial case in academia since the end of the 20th century.Liao Mingchun thought that the movement of doubting antiquity was directly affected by ＂Erasing Yao-Shun-Yu＂ thesis.However,Wu Rui has opposite opinion,who even thought that there was no relationship with each other.In fact,the views of Liao Mingchun and Wu Rui had problems.According to the existing data,Qian Xuantong and Gu Jiegang understood ＂Erasing Yao-Shun-Yu＂ thesis through many indirect texts,but understanding was equal to influence.The reason is that Qian Xuantong and Gu Jiegang may think that ＂Erasing Yao-Shun-Yu＂ wasn＇t a strange view.So then,they did not copy ＂Erasing Yao-Shun-Yu＂ thesis.

关 键 词：古史辨 “疑古”思想 “尧舜禹抹杀论” 学术公案 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]