检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨勇[1] 徐红革[1] 邱志杰[1] 王良恩[1] 杨彬[1] YANG Yong XU Hong-ge QIU Zhi-jie WANG Liang-en YANG Bin(Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Meishan, Meishan Sichnan 620010, China)
出 处:《蚌埠医学院学报》2016年第8期1017-1020,共4页Journal of Bengbu Medical College
摘 要:目的:对比关节镜下保留与清除断裂前交叉韧带(ACL)残端重建术后临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析70例获得12个月以上随访的ACL断裂患者临床资料,其中对照组35例采用传统清除残端重建ACL,观察组35例采用保留残端重建ACL,比较2组患者术后关节稳定性、关节功能及本体感觉恢复情况。结果:所有患者均获得随访,随访时间为12-27个月。2组患者术后关节稳定性差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);末次随访时观察组患者术后关节功能均优于对照组(P〈0.01);观察组患者术后本体感觉优于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论:关节镜下保留与清除残端重建ACL均能取得较好的临床疗效,恢复关节稳定性;但保留残端手术更有利于术后膝关节功能及本体感觉的恢复。Objective: To compare the clinical effects of remnant preservation and remnant remove in anterior cruciate ligament( ACL)reconstruction under arthroscopy. Methods: The clinical data of 70 ACL rupture patients followed by 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. The observation group( 35 cases) and control group( 35 cases) were treated with ACL reconstruction through remnant preservation and remove,respectively. The joint stability,joint function and proprioception recovery between two groups were analyzed.Results: All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. The difference of joint stability between two groups was not statistically significant( P〉0. 05). At the end of following up,the joint function in observation group was better than that in control group( P〈0. 01). The proprioception in observation group was better than that in control group( P〈0. 01). Conclusions: The effects of remnant preservation and remove in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under arthroscopy are good,and which can recover the joint stability. The remnant preservation method can more conducive to the recovery of knee joint function and proprioception.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15