检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪碧刚
机构地区:[1]北京大学科技开发部 [2]北京大学城市治理研究院
出 处:《经济社会体制比较》2016年第5期136-144,共9页Comparative Economic & Social Systems
摘 要:在2016年国务院颁发的《中共中央国务院关于进一步加强城市规划建设管理工作的若干意见》中,街区制替代封闭的住宅小区成为新建住宅的布局方向。文章通过对国内外相关文献的梳理,发现在我国推广街区制不仅要借鉴西方国家现代城市发展的经验,更应对我国传统居住文化进行理性回归。推广街区制不只是一个垒盖建筑的过程,更是"治愈"城市病的过程,其居住混合性与多样性有助于促进阶层间的交往沟通、共享公共资源,在一定程度上有助于缓解社会不平等。In the Guidelines of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on Strengthening the Management of Urban Planning and Construction issued in 2016, the block system, not the enclosed housing quarters, become a direction of the layout of new housing. Based on a review of relevant foreign and Chinese documents, this paper has found out that popularizing the block system in China is not only based on the experience of the Western modern urban development, but also is a kind of rational regression of our traditional residential culture. In a word, the promotion of the block system is not only about the construction of buildings, but also a process of "curing" city diseases. Furthermore, the diversity of living modality contributes to daily communication and interaction of different people, resource sharing of different areas, and to a certain extent, helps ease social inequality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229