检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐汉明[1,2,3] 张新平[4,1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法治发展与司法改革研究中心 [2]湖北法治发展战略研究院 [3]中国法学会法治研究基地 [4]中南财经政法大学
出 处:《经济社会体制比较》2016年第5期161-170,共10页Comparative Economic & Social Systems
基 金:国家法治与法学理论研究重点课题“社会治理法治研究”(项目编号:14SFB1001);中南财经政法大学博士科研创新重点项目“公众参与社会治理的法治化理论建构与进路探微”(项目编号:2015BZ0602)
摘 要:现代人格权法律保护因人格权实现形式的新发展而面临诸多挑战。人格权法律保护中出现了生命健康无价不可救济与权利损害赔偿的可救济可补偿法律责任理论的相悖与统一,权利主体生命健康自然天赋与生俱有的不可移转性与权利客体的可分性相悖与统一,人格权利益的自然天赋价值尺度与人格权利益的商品价值度量尺度的相悖与统一等问题。应对人格权法律保护面临的挑战,需从人格权保护的价值取向、模式选择、结构内容等层面入手,构建一套符合我国实际的人格权法律保护体系,加快推动我国民事法律制度现代化,促进中国特色社会主义法治体系的发展完善。Because of the new developments in the way personality right can be realized, the legal protection of modern personality right faces many challenges. In the legal protection of personality right, there appear the conflict and unity of the legal liability theory whereby priceless life and health cannot be compensated and the damages of rights can be compensated; the conflict and unity between those with the right who are born with the right to life, health and natural talent that are not transferable and the objects with this right that are separable; and the conflict and unity between the natural inherent value of personality right and the commodity value of personality right. In order to cope with these challenges, we can start with the value, mode selection and structural content of the protection of personality right, to establish a set of scientific and complete legal systems for protecting personality right, and to accelerate the modernization of China's civil legal system and promote the development and perfection of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3