中美科研不端举报人保护制度之比较  

Comparison of the Scientific Misconduct Whistleblower Protection Systems Between China and America

作　　者：董兴佩 

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学学报编辑部,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2016年第10期155-160,共6页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：青岛科技编辑学会期刊编辑学研究重点资助项目"学术出版机构学术不端追责制度研究"(QDKBZ201504)

摘　　要：美国科研不端举报人保护各层面立法细密、具体,形成了一个较为完善的制度体系。联邦机构与科研机构安排专人履行举报人保护职责,既分工明确又相互协作。举报人个人信息安全保护贯穿于科研不端查处各阶段,美国严厉禁止对举报人实施报复性人事行为,高额奖励和补偿也是科研不端举报人保护制度的重要内容。中国科研不端举报人保护制度还很落后,不仅需要借鉴美国的制度设计和司法实践,更需要从法律理念上实现从功利价值主义向人权保障主义的转变。The legislation of American scientific misconduct whistleblower protection are fine and specific at all levels, forming a relatively perfect system. Federal agencies and research institutions perform duties of the whistleblower protection by arranging specific person, both clear division of labor and mutual cooperation. Whistlehlower protection of personal information security is throughout each stage of the investigation of scientific misconduct. America prohibits retaliatory personnel behavior on whistleblower. High reward and compensation are also important part of scientific misconduct whistleblower protection system. There is no specific whistleblower protec- tion law in China and the utility of the legal basis for scientific misconduct whistleblower is relatively low.

关 键 词：科研不端举报人 个人信息安全 报复性人事行为 举报人有条件的特权 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]