检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省农业科学院,杭州310021
出 处:《农业经济问题》2016年第9期42-53,110-111,共12页Issues in Agricultural Economy
摘 要:本文将社会资本理论纳入Grossman健康需求框架,通过划分农民工社会资本城乡类型和维度结构,分析了农民工社会资本影响其健康的维度差异和类型差异,并基于2014年浙江省样本数据,通过IV-Probit模型和泊松回归等方法对研究假设进行了实证检验。研究表明,农民工社会资本存在健康促进效应,相对代表认知型社会资本的信任和互惠而言,代表结构型社会资本的社会网络对农民工健康具有更强的促进作用,而城镇型社会资本对农民工健康的促进效应大于乡村型社会资本。相关结论对于破解农民工健康困境、城镇化道路选择以及理解非正式制度与正式制度的关系具有一定启示。The paper explores that how the social capital of migrant workers affect their health status by integrating the social capital into the theory of Grossman health theory. Besides,this paper divides migrant worker's social capital into different urban- rural sections and construal dimensions according to their actual situation and social capital theory. Then the paper tests hypothesis of workers' social capital by IV- Probit and Poisson regression models based on survey data of Zhejiang Province in 2014.Results of this study are as followed: the social network as structural social capital has more positive effects on migrant workers health,compared with the trust and reciprocity as cognitive social capital. In addition,migrant workers' urban social capital has stronger effect on the returns on human capital migrant workers health than rural social capital. The enlightenment of the conclusions is that in solving the health problems of migrant workers,choice of the road of urbanization and optimizing formal systems and informal systems such as social capital.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49