图书馆学视阈内的客观性原则之诠释  

The Interpretation of Objectivity Principle in the Perspective of Library Science

作　　者：王学文[1] Wang Xuewen(Library, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471022, China)

机构地区：[1]洛阳师范学院图书馆,河南洛阳471022

出　　处：《现代情报》2016年第10期34-38,46,共6页Journal of Modern Information

基　　金：2012年国家社会科学基金项目"我国公共图书馆社会形象定位研究"(项目编号:12BTQ008)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：图书馆学的客观性依据是基于批判现实基础上的理性要求。它与古典图书馆学家崇尚的"实事求是"、"凸显本真"有着显著的区别。"实事求是"之所以不等同于客观性,缘由在于其实质上是一种高下分明的品级性。与之相反,客观性的实质体现在它的平等性上。图书馆学的客观性原则在过往的古典图书馆文化演进史上得以长久的承袭,主要在于其刻意求索着一种理想化的精神世界。这一理想化精神世界的内在底蕴是人性为本、自由发展和真理永恒。图书馆学中的各种偏见能够凭藉人性为本、自由发展和真理永恒加以克服,同时,人性为本、自由发展及真理永恒本体的偏见又能被图书馆学发展史所克服。The objectivity principle in library science is the rational requirement on the basis of critical realism.It is significantly different from the principles of ＂Be Practical and Realistic＂and ＂Highlight the Genuine＂upheld by classical library scientists.The reason leading to such differences is that they are essentially characterized by distinctive ranks while,on the contrary,the essence of objectivity principle is equality.The inheritance of objectivity principle along the long history of classical library culture evolution lied in its deliberate pursuit of ideal spiritual world.The intrinsic implications of such a world are humanity-oriented,free development and immortal truth.The preconceptions of library science could be overcame by the above three features while at the same time the bias of these features could in turn be surmounted by the development of library science.

关 键 词：图书馆学 客观性 平等性 原则 

分 类 号：G250.1[文化科学—图书馆学]