微创钢板固定与交锁髓内钉固定治疗闭合性胫骨干骨折对比观察  

The Comparative Observation of Closed Fracture of Tibiofibular Shaft Treated by Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Interlocking Intermeddler Nail

作　　者：朱大伟[1] 许兴柏[1] 杨太明[1] 郑红兵[1] 朱裕成[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院骨科,江苏南京223800

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2016年第04X期3-4,共2页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:对比微创钢板固定与交锁髓内钉固定治疗闭合性胫骨干骨折的效果。方法:将60例闭合性胫骨干骨折患者随机分为两组,30例/组。对照组行交锁髓内钉固定,观察组行微创钢板固定,对比两组术后恢复情况。结果:两组临床疗效无显著差异(P>0.05);对照组并发症发生率明显高于观察组,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 :两种手术治疗闭合性胫骨干骨折的疗效相近,但行微创钢板固定的患者术后并发症发生率更低。Objective： To compare the effect of closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft treated by minimal y invasive plate osteosynthesis and interlocking intermeddler nail. Methods： To randomly divided 60 cases of patients with closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft into two groups, 30 cases/ group. The control group was implemented the interlocking intermeddler nail, the treatment group was implemented the minimal y invasive plate osteosynthesis, to compared the recovery condition after operation of them. Results： The clinical effect of them was no statistical significance （P〉0.05）. The incidence rate of complication of the control group was significantly greater than the treatment group, there was statistical significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The treatment effects were closed of two methods for the closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft, but the minimal y invasive plate osteosynthesis has lower incidence rate of complication.

关 键 词：微创钢板固定 交锁髓内钉固定 闭合性胫骨干骨折 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]