检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西省弋阳县人民医院外1科,江西弋阳334400
出 处:《中国当代医药》2016年第28期81-83,共3页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的 评价股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定用于老年股骨粗隆间骨折(IFF)的治疗效果。方法 选取2012年1月-2015年6月在我院接受治疗的IFF老年患者106例,将其随机分为对照组(53例)和观察组(53例),分别给予动力髋螺钉(DHS)和PFNA内固定治疗。比较两组的治疗效果。结果 观察组手术时间、下地活动时间及骨折愈合时间均显著短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);观察组术后3个月和半年时的Harris评分分别为(84.25±10.68)分和(89.50±11.71)分,均显著高于对照组(P〈0.01);观察组术后并发症总发生率显著低于对照组(7.55%vs 30.19%,P〈0.01)。结论 PFNA治疗老年IFF创伤小、术后恢复快、并发症少,临床可推广应用。Objective To evaluate the effect of PFNA internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture (IFF) in the elderly.Methods There were 106 elderly patients with IFF in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2015 were selected,and divided into control group (53 cases) and observation group (53 cases).The control group was given dynamic hip screw (DHS) treatment,and observation group was given femoral proximal anti rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) internal fixation.The treatment effect was compared.Results Operative time,activities and fracture healing time of observation group were significantly shorter than those of control group,blood loss was less than that of control group, with statistical difference (P〈0.01).Harris score of observation group after 3 months and 6 months respectively (84.25± 10.68) and (89.50±11.71),significantly higher than those of control group(P〈0.01).Postoperative complication occurrence rate of observation group was significantly lower than control group (7.55% vs 30.19%,P〈0.01).Conclusion PFNA treat- ment of elderly patients with IFF has the advantages of less trauma,faster postoperative recovery,less complications and other advantages,and can be used in clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.255.247